2011/06/28

Presumption of perversity

I took a break at lunch today and went to sit on a bench at a beach not far from work. As is typical on hot and sunny midsummer days it was well-populated both with young moms and toddlers, and with beautiful teens in nearly-nothing bikinis. As an aside to my story, I find not at all unpleasant the sight of two groups of four such lasses meeting and exchanging every combination of excited happy hugs.

While I sat taking in the air and sun, I noticed a woman, not dressed for a day at the beach, walking slowly along the path that borders it. She stopped every few feet, faced the beach, found a group of girls — my view wasn't perfect, but she appeared to be concentrating on the beach bunnies rather than the families — and very obviously snapped a photo with her SLR. She was not being shy about it, nor hurrying. She was not credentialed or uniformed in any way I could detect. After a couple of dozen photos she strolled off.

Obviously, I have no idea of her interests or motives. Could be as innocent as having a new camera and wanting to try out its bright-sun features. Could be she is trend-spotting as a buyer for next year’s swimsuits. Might have been a newspaper photographer needing a beach shot for the weather section.

But imagine if a man had done the same thing. Would one of the lifeguards have asked what he was up to? Would a passing police officer have asked to see the photos? Would the assumption have been that he was perving on the tight little almost-naked teens and preparing to head home for a session of... study and review?

Not having tried the experiment, I can’t really say. But I think the presumption of ill intentions is there for men. Justifiably? Maybe. I regret it, however.

— Frenulum

2011/06/27

Led

Hauntingly appealing. I keep looking at this one.
Stories welcome, as always. <sound of crickets>
— Frenulum

Events Eventuate

...as the bumper sticker says, or should, if vulgarity were not so sadly commonplace.

I apologize for being scarce; but knew when I started this that the nag of the blog (“Post something! Post something!”) would sometimes have to be ignored despite its stridency.

But tires blow, people need attention, work demands to be finished... you all know the drill.

Thanks for your patience.

— Frenulum

2011/06/19

Training

“I’m going to gag you,” I promised her.

“I’ll make you cry,” I added. She looked up at me, bright eyes wide and calm.

“You won’t be able to breathe, for a while,” I said. “It will be up to me to decide when you can.”

“Yes, Sir,” she whispered. “Please.” Her voice was like a prayer, almost a hymn.

“Please, Sir,” she begged, “I need to be —”

— Frenulum

2011/06/15

Top down?

A reader, Amy, with whom I have exchanged many letters, sent me this question a few days ago:

Do you mind if I ask you a little about your writing process? I’m curious if you ever approach stories... I’m not sure how to put it... from the top down, I guess? Like using a Campbellian mythic cycle for structure, for instance. Or is it more making things up as you go? Or something else?

This post is an attempt at an answer. I know that for everything I am about to say, there will be one or more exceptions, which I might or might not point out depending on if I think they’re interesting.

Like most of you, I imagine, I have flashes of sexual fantasy. That has been true since the first day I saw a girl naked: I had absolutely no clue about sex or the use of body parts at the time, but I knew I wanted to do something with her. (What I imagined is irrelevant except for this: at the age of perhaps seven years old, I was already thinking in terms of dominant and submissive behaviors — further support for my contention that those traits are innate.)

Sometimes such flashes are formless. Sometimes they are fleeting, like ill-remembered dreams. Some have a little staying power, and come back more than once. Here’s a brand new one, from looking at a photo with my belovèd yesterday and tossing story lines at each other:

What if a fellow came home and found that a girl he slightly knew, someone whom he had no idea had any interest in or attraction to him, had conned her way into his place and was waiting for him, nearly naked?

That’s it. No story, no characters, no motivation, no history, no future, no idea how it might play out (except insofar as the story in which he indignantly tells her to get dressed and get out would be no fun to write). No decision on the question: is she so infatuated that she can’t be bothered with getting to know him conventionally, or is she so desperate or in trouble or under someone else’s influence that she is there reluctantly? Given that little oocyte of an idea, there are dozens of potential stories.

So what I do, when the flash of fantasy becomes solid enough to be captured in a sentence, as above, is to write just that much down, stick it in a file in my Work-In-Progress folder, and let it sit.

Over the ensuing months, I might recall it, or I might not. If I do, I will slowly begin to think about stories and the characters who might populate them. What sort of girl would be that bold (if she’s there eagerly, not apprehensively)? What would make her think “The heck with dating and fencing around and getting to know each other and games, I want him inside me today”? Is it just physical attraction, is she leaking every time she sees him? Is she a submissive girl who recognizes his quiet authority? Is she a schemer who wants something he can give her? Or if it will be an [RC] story, what straits have compelled her to surrender her dignity and freedom of choice?

In time, one of those ideas will begin to seem sustainable, in that I have characters, motivations, emotions, conversations, and situations that feel consistent and interesting to me. At that point, it’s less of a fantasy/idea/potential and more of an unwritten story. When it has that feeling of solidity, I open up the WIP file and write down whatever I’ve come up with. It might be fragments of dialog, or notes to myself to remember a certain action or frame of mind or mood. And then it sits again, simmering, sometimes for years. I began Quality Assurance twelve years ago; perhaps it will survive, perhaps not. I open it up from time to time and add thoughts.

At some point, one story gains focus, to the extent that I can say it is my current project and that I’m actually writing it. Sometimes there are bumps on that road. I am currently working on Empty Nest, but that has been true for about three years, and in the meantime I’ve published thirty flash fiction morsels, Recession, and Lust For Elsa. Sometimes a story that’s pretty far along just dies off, usually because in the meantime I find that I have covered its themes or ideas in other stories. This can result in a great deal of text being abandoned: School For Wives was as long as Order when I binned it.

But, once I do finally get settled in to a single tale, I write sporadically and non-linearly. That is, I write in small bursts of time — I find it difficult to sustain the right mood for a long time — and I don’t usually write in order (counterexample: Empty Nest is progressing beginning-to-end). If I feel like working on a climactic moment in the middle of the story, I do; if I feel like working on introducing and establishing characters and motivations, I do; if I feel like I am up for dialog but not for narrative, then I work on dialog. It probably is obvious that, even as I write to entertain and arouse others, I write to please myself: girls are pretty and wear sexy things, blow jobs are sloppy, romance is real, spankings are loving, reluctant, and fierce, teenage virgins are attracted to oldsters like me :o)

It generally takes from several months to three years to write a story, depending on length and complexity.

Now, Amy asked about making things up as I go. I don’t set out with that approach in mind; generally speaking, I start with a pretty good idea of the story I want to write or the characters I want to write about. In the former case, I think about plot and then create the characters that will make it work; in the latter, I create the personalities, thoughts, and emotions and then see how those characters might interact with each other. But things get odd.

I don’t write about genitalia with bodies attached, I write about people, characters and personalities that are fully formed in my mind (I often don’t know what they look like, but I always know how they think and feel). In my experience, once the characters exist, they have power to shape the story out of my hands.

A case in point: I have no real interest in polygyny. My experience with sex is in loving, monogamous relationships. I especially can’t conceive of an owner/submissive relationship that isn’t mutually devoted and single-focused. But at the end of First Date, we discover that Sarah is joining a harem.

I didn’t set out to write that. No idea could have been more remote from my thoughts. But Porter turned out to be arrogant, powerful, and manipulative, and his character drove the ending. I was astonished by it; the result is a story I did not mean to write and am not particularly happy with. For the record, the germ of that tale was the elevator scene, and everything else grew around that one tiny spark of fantasy.

Finally, for I have rambled on far too long, the writing is finished. Almost always, that means that there are open questions and unfinished business left for you, dear readers, to contemplate, for even my longest works are meant as Flash-like inspiration for your own fantasies. And then all that is left is the little task of editing: say, oh, a hundred re-readings of the text, polishing and tweaking and rewriting on every trip. Another span of months or years. But I know it’s worth the work, from all the comments I get that mention thanks for the clean grammar, spelling, and other mechanics.

So I guess the answer to the original question is: something else. A slow, organic, and sometimes out-of-my-hands growth from seed to story. Perhaps if had a more disciplined approach I could write more or better. But at least for now, this is how I write.

— Frenulum

2011/06/14

Story potential

My belovèd enjoys pictures with high story-potential as much as I do, and we were looking at this one together a little while ago. I think we ended up with about half a dozen story lines it could plausibly illustrate (some a bit easier to argue for than others).
How about using the comment link below to say what story comes to your mind?
— Frenulum

Cosplay

I think I understand most of the common costume fantasies, whether they appeal to me or not.

Schoolgirl: innocence, virginity, submission to an authority figure, maybe some spanking for those who like such things. Maid: submissive again, perhaps fodder for an [RC] scene (“If you value your job, Jeanette...”). Policewoman: authority reversed, with some bondage potential. All standard fare at your favorite lingerie/costume shop.

But there’s one I just can’t wrap my mind around: nurse.

For one thing, honestly, when is the last time you saw a nurse in a white dress and stockings with her distinctive nursing-school cap? Forty years ago? (Ok, maybe not many maids wear petticoats these days, but at least in some hotels they’re in dresses.) No, it’s scrubs: pants and a shapeless tunic.

But mainly my puzzlement stems from this: I associate nurses with pain, nausea, doubt, fear, and wanting to be anywhere else. “This will sting a little” — when it’s too late to escape. So tell me, seriously, who gets aroused in these situations? And what is the fantasy basis in the first place? Is it that a woman trained in care-giving will know a secret penis handshake or something?

’Tis a puzzlement.

— Frenulum

2011/06/11

Typos

Last night a faithful reader pointed out a typographical error — a redundant word, probably left behind after trying out a couple of phrasings — in First Date. Which was published in 2008 after, if memory serves, about ten months of editing and proofreading.

This sort of thing happens from time to time. I caught a typo myself in The Education of Heather S. just a few months ago, after some three years of working on it.

I think the brain is so adapted to correcting and compensating for linguistic hiccups that minor errors simply get fixed at a pre-conscious level. I wish it were otherwise — I take a lot of trouble to give readers an error-free product — but if there is a cure I haven’t found it.

Anyway: thanks, Amy, good catch.

— Frenulum

2011/06/08

Scheduling note

Dear readers,

Some personal-life complications are likely to keep me tied up between Friday and probably the middle of next week.

Please don’t think I have abandoned you if there isn’t much activity here, or if email responses are not the promptest.

Thank you in advance for your forbearance.

— Frenulum

2011/06/07

Enjoyable

Just tripped across this photo, and the joy apparent in it made me smile. May it do the same for you.
— Frenulum

2011/06/06

It’s late

...and I am tired, and I have a lot on my mind; and I am prone to occasional insomnia at ordinary times. So this might be one of those nights.

I am reading a few things. I keep books in many places and am usually in the middle of a bunch at once. I’ve several readers who have the same habit, and they often mention that people in their worlds find this odd. But it is quite normal to me... the book of baseball stats lying on the tank of the... um, study. The mystery by the bedside... the history of science or biography or memoir of the Revolution or the fantasy novel or whatever, piled up beside my 30-year-old Stressless recliner: leather and rosewood. I can tell how tired I am just by how bad this writing is :o)

This passage just caught my fancy. It’s from Rizzo’s Fire by Lou Manfredo.

“Male white, about forty, six feet even, ’bout one-ninety. Brown hair, short. Wearing a plain dark jacket and camouflage fatigue pants with dark brown boots.”

Rizzo frowned, reaching absentmindedly to rub at a slight eye twitch. “What kinda fatigues?” he asked.

“Military fatigues,” Sastone said.

...“Were they brown and tan desert fatigues or green and black jungle fatigues?”

Sastone shrugged. “I don’t know. What’s the fuckin’ difference? The guy had on fatigues. Me, I was in the Navy. We dressed like gentlemen.”

Goodnight, dear readers.

— Frenulum

Coffee Service

Her voice wakes me: “Good morning, sir!”

Ah, Prudence. If the upstairs maid is Prudence, today must be Thursday.

I sit up and pull the covers off. My cock starts to harden.

Prudence sets down the coffee service. She pours a steaming cup — what an enticing fragrance. She lifts the cup, gives me a saucy wink, and fills her mouth with piping hot coffee. She holds it there while she slowly, teasingly takes off her apron; high heels and a cute lace cap are all that’s left of her uniform. She waits and watches until my cock reaches full size.

She kneels beside the bed. Swallows. Begins.

— Frenulum

2011/06/02

Ladies’ choice

Men who clamor for a sequel to Neighborly do so for a pretty straightforward reason: they want more sex with characters they enjoyed (see the post Popular sequels).

Women readers also have a story that leaves them demanding, asking, or even begging for more: Earning Her Tuition.

What’s fascinating, though, is that they don’t want to read more of the student/college/producer/studio story. The ladies consistently plead for one particular sequel: the fourth movie.

You will perhaps recall that Corinna made three films for Handprint, and at the end of the story had returned to ask Mr. Browning to make one more film with her: a very specific scene with a very suggestive scenario.

What my readers are asking for, in large numbers, is the tale of a girl who is sent to her bedroom for a spanking — and, because of Handprint’s formula, a blow job and a facial.

I leave the exact rôles unspoken, but there can be no doubt that it would be a father-daughter scene. (Which, by the way, is a guarantee that I won’t write it.) I continue to wonder at the reason for the strong interest amongst my readers.

The theme of Earning Her Tuition is at heart Corinna’s relationship with her father. He is the one she dreads to disappoint; he is the one whose pride at her college admission still shines in her mind. He is the quietly authoritative figure she looks up to, and carries as a model for the kind of man she can admire and love. He is the reliable strength she is thinking of when she says:

It makes me think of being out in the field back home, with a strong wind blowing so hard you can kind of lean against it.

We know that Corinna was not spanked at home. I assert that there was nothing but fillial love between her and her father. She wants to make the bedroom scene not because it represents the relationship she wishes she had with her father, but because he is the archetype of the lover she does desire.

Could it be Doug Browning? The only way to know would be to write a sequel.

— Frenulum

Cunt-honey

I can’t recall when I started using the phrase “cunt-honey” for a lady’s natural, welcome, useful, tasty moisture. I feel that it was before I started writing but cannot definitely put a finger on it.
I like its assonance. I like the interplay of explicit bedroom language and the soft, sweet, commonplace.
And of course as a writer it’s good to have a bag of synonyms handy, so it’s not juices juices juices juices every time the subject comes up.
This illustration is exquisitely appealing, I find. Click to see it full-size, lest you miss the detail that really makes the photo.


— Frenulum

2011/06/01

Popular sequels

Throughout the years, readers have asked many times for sequels to a favorite story. As you know, I haven’t yet written any — but I do keep a count of the requests.

Two stories stand out, not only in the number of requests, but in the way that folks insist on having sequels. That I don’t have an option. That they need more.

But the really curious thing is that men have one must-continue story, and women have another. Their clamor rises to equal levels, but the division in choices is quite striking.

Men overwhelmingly ask for the next (“missing”) scene in Neighborly. (Congratulations to reader Sirsgirl1630 for getting that one right.) The requests range from polite disappointment...

“I was looking forward to a threesome between Colin and the twins”

“...[S]tart the next story with the twins knocking on Mr. Ryhs door.”

“I only have one complaint. It stopped to short. I would love to see a sequel, where Mr. Rhys does in fact pop both twin teen cherries.”

...to outrage? desperation? pleading?

“What did I think of it?!?! NO NO NO NO YOU CANT DO THIS. YOUR QUESTION SUGGESTS THAT YOU'VE FINISHED THE STORY. COME ON, COLIN'S HAD THEM-THE WHOLE MISCRIENT FAMILY-RIGHT IN THE PALM OF HIS HUGE HAND. YOUR JUST GONNA END IT RIGHT THERE? PLEASE DONT, YOU HAVE TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING. DAM IT!! I DONT THINK YOU REALIZE JUST HOW HARD IT IS FOR A SINGLE MOM TO RAISE TWO HORNY VIRGINS. COLINS WORK IS NOT DONE DAM IT.”

It’s not hard to figure out what is motiviating the gentleman reader. He just wants a little more action with the lovely, sexy, experienced/innocent, identical Emma and Molly, with a pair of deflorations to add some spice (maybe a bit spicier because of [Size]). Pretty basic stuff.

But the ladies...

Well, perhaps I can save that one for another post.

— Frenulum